Roger Kimball

Lives of the Mind: The Use and Abuse of Intelligence from Hegel to Wodehouse

 kimball.jpg

A collection of entertaining and never boring essays on very different kinds of philosophers and literary figures. One thing they all have in common: their mighty intellects. However, as the subtitle indicates, they have either used or abused those intellects. The obvious case for the latter being Hegel; in lesser degrees most of the others; and finally, the former being a few who have made good use of their God-given talent, like Wodehouse of Trollope, never mind that not everybody has been appreciative of the fact.

Mr. Kimball makes use of recently published books on those authors to recall those culturally relevant figures, in their worldly aspects as well as their social and academic repercussions. We get quite good analyses of personages like Hegel, Bertrand Russell, Kierkegaard, P.G. Wodehouse, David Stove, Schopenhauer, Tocqueville, Walter Bagehot... I liked some essays better than others; I didn't dislike any. But a few really were worth reads since I didn't know a thing about them and I became quite intrigued now, for instance, the case of David Stove or Bagehot or Trollope. If their lives do not appeal too much to the modern reader, at least Mr. Kimball does excellently well by getting us hooked on the nature of their work, quite worthy of the minds they had.

As for the negative side of the authors studied here, their abuse of intelligence, would suffice to quote the words of Bertrand Russell:

“I think he [Wittgenstein] has genius. In discussion with him I put out all my force and only just equaled his. With all my other pupils I should squash them flat if I did so.”

A game, it was. I game of intellects; a competition of show-offs. Buffoons who made mockery of their clever minds by putting them to use only to win acclaim, reputation, a name. Proverbs 1:7 speaks to them when it calls them fools who despise wisdom and instruction. Why? because they have no fear of the Lord, which is the beginning of wisdom.


"Es cierto que el Romano es libre de hacer todo lo que quiera. Pero también lo es que tiene que soportar las consecuencias de sus actos. No importa que se haya equivocado, que le hayan engañado o incluso forzado: un hombre no se deja forzar: etiamsi coactus, attamen voluit. Es libre; pero si distraído, imprudente o atontado, prometió pagar una determinada cantidad y no puede pagarla, se convierte en esclavo de su acreedor."

Rudolph von Ihering

“Slavery, protection, and monopoly find defenders, not only in those who profit by them, but in those who suffer by them.”

Frédéric Bastiat

On the true nature of the Castro Revolution in Cuba: "The revolution was a cover for committing atrocities without the slightest vestige of guilt ... we were young and irresponsible. We were pirates. We formed our own caste ... we belonged to and believed in nothing -no religion, no flag, no morality or principle. It's fortunate we didn't win, because if we had, we would have drowned the continent in barbarism."

Jorge Masetti -In the Pirate's Den

La anarquía, es decir, la ausencia de fuerza estatal, no es una forma de Estado, y cualquiera que acabe con ella por el medio que sea, el usurpador nacional o el conquistador extranjero, rinde un servicio a la sociedad. Es un salvador, un bienhechor, porque la forma más insoportable de Estado es la ausencia de Estado.


Rudolph von Ihering

"El envidioso está afligido no solo por sus males propios, sino por los bienes de los demás."  -Hipias

[la norma de conducta de los progres] "No hacer nada que alguien pueda envidiarme." -Hipasos

NINOTCHKA,

O EL DISCRETO DESENCANTO CON EL SOCIALISMO 

ninotchka.jpg

Seguimos a la espera de la reedición de este importante libro del gran escritor español José Pla

Historia de la Segunda República.

jose_pla.jpg   

También a la espera de este importante libro del genial Rafael Abella.

Finales de enero, 1939, Barcelona cambia de piel

rafael_abella.jpg

2012 © CREOWEBS. Diseñamos y creamos. !!!